Lesson 3 – Multiblasting

1. INTRODUCTION

This Code of Practice has been written in line with the Industry Best Practice Guideline produced by the Group Environmental Engineers, submitted through the Chamber of Mines. The purpose of this code of practice is to ensure that the re-entry periods applied under differing occupational environmental conditions ensure that no persons are exposed to occupational health risks at Barberton Mines.

 

 

2. LEGAL STATUS OF CODE OF PRACTICE 

2.1. In accordance with section 9(2) and (3) of the MHSA, Barberton Mines has prepared and implemented this Code of Practice for the safe operation of multi blasting accordance industry best practice guidance note issued by the Chief Inspector of Mines.

2.2. This COP sets out accepted good practices, the application of inferior practices without justification could be regarded as negligence.

2.3. The COP may be used in an accident investigation/inquiry to ascertain compliance and also to establish whether the COP is effective and fit for purpose.

2.4 All managerial instructions or recommended procedures and standards on prevention of flammable gas explosions are compliant with this COP and are reviewed to ensure compliance.

 

 

3. RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE MHSA

3.1 Barberton Mines has assessed the hazards and responded to the risks to health and safety, in terms of Section 11 of the MHSA, to which employees may be exposed while they are at work.

3.2 Barberton Mines has established and maintaining a system of occupational hygiene measurements and engage the part-time or full-time services of a person qualified in occupational hygiene techniques to measure levels of exposure to hazards at the mine, in terms of Section 12. (1) of the MHSA.

3.3 Every system of occupational hygiene measurements will be appropriate in terms of the hazards to which employees are, or may be, exposed and must provide information, which Barberton Mines can use to eliminate, control and minimise such health risks and hazards, in terms of Section 12. (2) of the MHSA.

3.4 Records are kept of all such measurements in order that it can be linked, as far as practicable, to an employee’s records of medical surveillance, in terms of Section 12. (3) of the MHSA.

3.5 Other relevant COPs and SOPs

Env-COP-21 Prevention Flammable gas explosions

Env-COP-26 Thermal Stress

Env-SOP-74 Lamp room

Env-COP-28 Lamp room

Env-SOP-55 Ventilation standard procedure

Env-COP-12 Airborne Pollutants

 

 

4. DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS

In order to differentiate between mining operations using multi-blasting and time blasting, these definitions will apply. It should be noted that in all three definitions cognizance must be taken of the occupational hygiene regulations, which requires that no persons must be exposed to airborne contaminants.

 

Time-blasting

Blasting operations taking place not more than once in any 24-hour cycle (as per paragraph 5.2).

 

Multi-blasting

Multiple blasting including shaft sinking operations, which could take place during any working shift. Such blasting may only take place where efficacious means of separating intake and return air e.g. a dedicated return airway is provided (as per paragraph 5.3).

 

Fixed-time multi-blasting

Blasting more than once per 24 hours, but not more than once per shift, for both stoping and development, taking cognisance of a re-entry period sufficient to clear all airways where persons are expected to work or travel (as per paragraph 5.4).

The re-entry period must be determined by a risk assessment and validated whenever key factors, that can have a significant effect on the re-entry conditions, change.

 

 

ACRONYMS

MHSA-  Mine Health and Safety Act

RAW-  Return Airway

L-  L

W-  With

H-  Height

m/s-  Meters per second

m³/s-  Cubic meters per second

m³/s /m²-    Cubic meters per second per square meter

FQ-  Force Quantity

 

 

5. RE-ENTRY INTERVALS

In terms of Regulation 9.2(1) of the MHSA Barberton Mines will ensure that the occupational exposure to health hazards of employees is maintained below the limits set out in Schedule 22.9(a) and (b). The intervals which must expire before persons are allowed to re-enter the workings of your mine in which blasting has taken place, should be fixed as follows:

 

5.1 Nil re-entry interval

A re-entry interval need not be observed where persons are expected to work or travel if uncontaminated through ventilation has been established and is effective / operational.

 

5.2 General re-entry interval

Should blasting fumes however contaminate the air in any of the workings the general re-entry interval, as set out in the paragraph below, must be observed in those workings.

A general re-entry interval after the blast in all ventilation districts must be observed in terms of Regulation 9.2.1: “The employer must ensure that the occupational exposure to health hazards of employees is maintained below the limits set out in Schedule 22.9(2)(a) and (b)”. This re-entry interval has been determined after a detailed and recorded risk assessment and excludes the workings mentioned in paragraphs 5.1, 5.3 and 5.4.

 

5.3 multi-blast re-entry interval

In terms of Regulation 9.2.1 the employer must ensure that the occupational exposure to health hazards of employees is maintained below the limits set out in Schedule 22.9(2)(a) and (b).

 

A minimum 30-minute re-entry interval must be observed, and the following provisions must be made applicable to all multi-blast development ends or shafts being sunk:

 

5.3.1 Minimum air quantities required (relative to the air density at the working face)

5.3.1.1  The quantity of air forced shall be established through a risk assessment process to   ensure that the air supplied is of a quality as set out in Schedule 22.9(2) (a) and (b) and   should not be less than 0,25 m3/s for every square meter of face area, for all multi-blast development ends.

 

5.3.1.2  The quantity of air exhausted from the development end should be not less than twice more than the quantity of air supplied by the force column referred to in paragraph 5.3.1.1 above.

A minimum force exhaust ratio of 1:2 should be maintained at all times to ensure that no uncontrolled re-circulation takes place in the overlap section.

 

5.3.2 Ventilation arrangements

 

5.3.2.1 Horizontal development, inclines, declines and raises.

 

5.3.2.1.1 An exhaust-overlap system of ventilation should be used for every end being multi-blasted.

 

5.3.2.1.2 The intake of the exhaust column should be carried to a point not exceeding thirty (30) metres from the face.

 

5.3.2.1.3 The distance between the discharge of the force column and the advancing face must be such as to ensure that the ventilating air reaches the face and should not be more than twenty (20) metres from the face of the end after the blast.

 

5.3.2.1.4 The minimum overlap distance between the exhaust column intake and the force column intake points should be at least 10 metres and not exceeding 25 metres.

 

5.3.2.1.5 Fans in the exhaust column should be positioned in such a manner that the exhaust column remains under negative pressure, thus ensuring that no exhaust fumes leak back into the intake air flowing to the face.

a)To prevent open circuit exhaust fans from recirculating, sufficient through ventilation, at least 0.4 m3/s/m2 of through ventilation, should be provided at these fan sites at all times.

b)The exhaust fans in an exhaust-overlap system, which are the primary source of ventilation, should be interlocked with all other electrical appliances and equipment in the end being multi-blasted. This is to ensure that, in the event of the exhaust fans stopping, all other electrical appliances and equipment will also shut down.

c)No butterfly valves must be positioned in any exhaust column in development ends.

 

5.3.2.1.6.  The force fan must be positioned only in the overlap section of the ventilation system.

 

5.3.2.1.7 An effective dust allaying mechanism must be operated during the blast and the re-entry period at a distance not exceeding 20m from the face.

 

5.3.2.1.8  If, at any stage, blasting fumes from the end being multi-blasted contaminates any working places in the vicinity, then multi-blasting must cease and conventional time blasting (as per paragraph 5.2) or fixed-time blasting (as per paragraph 5.4) must be followed until conditions have been rectified for multi-blasting. The ends so contaminated must also be on conventional time blasting.

 

5.3.2.1.9  The dust and fumes from blasting operations must be exhausted directly to surface via an established RAW and must not contaminate any place where persons may be required to work or travel.

 

5.3.2.1.10  The number of air changes, calculated on the volume of air between the face and the intake of the force column, required shall be determined through a risk assessment process to ensure that on re-entry after the blast the air in the development end is of a quality as set out in Schedule 22.9 (2) (a) and (b) and should not be less than 8 changes.

 

NB: For raises, winzes and declines the following will, in addition, apply:

a) The exhaust column intake must be situated in the crosscut; and

b) Ore passes must never be completely empty, to prevent re-circulation.

 

5.3.3 Shaft sinking

 

5.3.4  The bank area must be kept clear of blasting fumes and the shaft must remain down casting, in the bank area, at all times.

 

5.3.4.1  The force column delivery must at least be to the bottom deck of the stage during blasting.

 

5.3.5  Compliance testing Shafts

 

5.3.5.1  Workplace environmental conditions on re-entry must be of a quality as set out in Schedule 22.9(2)(a) and (b).

 

5.3.5.2  Gravimetric dust measurement results on re-entry with a Tyndall meter or similar dust-measuring instrument must be less than an AQI of 1,0 taken over a 2-minute period, using previously determined hazardous pollutant values.

 

5.3.6  Blasting initiation

Blasting initiation must be conducted electrically.

 

5.4  Fixed-time multi-blast re-entry interval

For blasting more than once in 24 hours, but not more than once per shift, a minimum re-entry interval will be determined after a detailed and recorded risk assessment with the following provisions made applicable to all fixed-time multi-blast development ends or stopes:

 

5.4.1  Minimum air quantities required (relative to the air density at the working face)

 

5.4.1.1  The quantity of air forced shall be established through a risk assessment process to ensure that the air supplied is of a quality as set out in Schedule 22.9 (2) (a) and (b) and should not be less than 0, 15 m3/s for every square meter of face area, for all multi-blast development ends.

 

5.4.1.2  The minimum stope face velocity averaged across the height of the stope should be determined through a risk assessment process to ensure that the quality of air is such that it meets the requirements as laid down in Schedule 22.9 (2) (a) and (b) and should not be less than 0.25 m/s. This should vary when determining the desired re-entry interval.

 

5.4.1.3 The number of air changes, calculated on the volume of air between the face and the intake of the force column, required shall be determined through a risk assessment process to ensure that on re-entry after the blast the air in the development end is of a quality as set out in Schedule 22.9 (2) (a) and (b) and should not be less than 8 air changes. The risk assessment must take into account all areas that maybe contaminated by the blast including “back pressure”.

 

5.4.2  Compliance testing Fixed-time multi-blast

 

5.4.2.1  Workplace environmental conditions on re-entry must be of a quality as set out in Schedule 22.9(2)(a) and (b).

 

5.4.2.2  Dust measurement results on re-entry, with a Tyndall meter (direct electronic dust monitor) or similar dust- measuring instrument, must be less than an AQI of 1,0 taken over a 2-minute period, using previously determined hazardous pollutant values.

 

5.6  Blasting initiation

Blasting initiation must be conducted electrically.

 

 

6. RISK ASSESSMENT

 

6.1  Aspects to be addressed

The risk assessment must, at least, cover the following;

 

6.1.1  A risk-assessment must be conducted and recorded on the specific operation.

 

6.1.2  Appropriate exposure measurements and environmental engineering controls must be put in place to comply with legal occupational hygiene requirements.

 

6.1.3  Hazards to be taken into account when conducting a risk assessment should include, but not limited to, the following:

  • Noxious fumes from blasting;
  • Dust created by blasting;
  • Flammable gas;
  • Thermal environment; and Diesel particle emission

 

6.2  Waiting Place

 

6.2.1  Blasting must be carried out from a place of safety demarcated by the manager. This position must be sign posted as “Waiting Place” and also act as a contraband control point, where applicable.

 

6.2.2  The blasting times must be recorded, and the re-entry interval must be specified and posted on the waiting place signboard and other relevant conspicuous places.

 

6.3  Miscellaneous

 

6.3.1  Continuously operating flammable gas measuring instruments must be used at all drilling sites (inclusive of cover/diamond/prospect drilling sites).

 

6.3.2  All calculations must be done and verified by the person engaged in terms of section 12.1 of the MHSA.

 

6.3.3  Your attention is also drawn to the MHSA Regulations published in the Government Gazette No. 23583, dated 2 July 2002. The following regulations must be noted: 9.1(3), 9.1(4) and 9.2(1).

 

6.3.4  All persons concerned must be made fully conversant with the terms of this guidance note, copies of which must be readily available to them.

NOTE:

If, at any stage, blasting fumes from any end being multi-blasted contaminates any working places in the vicinity then multi-blasting must cease and conventional time blasting, or fixed-time blasting, must be done until conditions have been rectified for multi-blasting.

 

8. CALCULATION OF THE RE-ENTRY INTERVAL FOR SEQUENTIALLY VENTILATED DEVELOPMENT ENDS

 

Example 1

 

Assumptions.

1.All ends are at maximum length (180m)

2.Spacing of ends: 120m apart.

3.No ventilation column leakage

4.14m3/s force ventilation per end (QF)

5.100m3/s through ventilation in Haulage

9.  ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF FORCED AND EXHAUST OVERLAP SYSTEMS

 

9.1  Advantages of forced column system when multi-blasting

 

9.1.1  Good quality air is delivered to the face at high velocity where the workers derive maximum benefit.

9.1.2  Only a single fan and single column are required.

9.1.3  The fan and fan motor are always in fresh air.

9.1.4  Leakage is always from the column and hence easily detected.

 

9.2  Disadvantages of forced column system when multi-blasting

 

9.2.1  Persons travelling and working in the drive do so in return air.

9.2.2   Long re-entry periods after the blast are necessary, hence rendering this system unsuitable for multi-blast development

9.2.3  Fumes from the blast are returned to the general mine air circuit.

 

9.3  Advantages of exhaust overlap system when multi-blasting

 

9.3.1  Rapid clearance of blasting fumes permits short re-entry period.

9.3.2  Persons travelling and working in the drive do so in fresh air as the return air is exhausted via the main column.

9.3.3  Blasting fumes are exhausted directly to return.

 

9.4  Disadvantages of exhaust overlap system when multi-blasting

 

9.4.1  The quality of air supplied to the face is inferior to that supplied by the forcing system. The slow-moving intake air along the drive can pick up heat, dust and gases in transit to the face.

9.4.2  Two columns and two fans are required.

9.4.3  Poor conditions can exist in the overlap section.

 

 

NOTE:

a) Fans in the exhaust column must be positioned in such a manner that the exhaust column remains under negative pressure, thus ensuring that no exhaust fumes leak back into the intake air flowing to the face.

b) The exhaust fans, which are the primary source of through ventilation, should be interlocked with all other electrical appliances and equipment in the end being multiblasted. This is to ensure that, in the event of the exhaust fans stopping, all other electrical appliances and equipment will also shut down.

c) No Butterfly valves must be positioned in any exhaust column

d) To prevent open0circuit exhaust fans from recirculating a volume of at least 0,4m3/s/m2 of through ventilation, at such fan sites, must be maintained at all times.

 

 

10. Implementation

 

This procedure is applicable to all relevant HOD’s

 

Once the COP’s have been approved and signed off by the relevant HOD’s it will be:

 

1.Published to PAR SHEQ Optimal Solve

2.Copies will be sent to all the HOD’s

3.Training material will be updated accordingly

4.Any changes made to a COP or SOP will be highlighted in the procedure.

5.A Memo will be drafted with changes made to the SOP/ COP and state which SOP/ COP was communicated.

6.Only the changes made to the SOP/ COP will be communicated by the Supervisor to the Employees.

7.The Memo will also state within what period the SOP/ COP must be communicated.

8.All present will sign an attendance register and records thereof to be kept by the Supervisor

9.An updated version of the SOP/ COP will be readily available at the Supervisor and HOD offices.

 

The HOD will keep records of the attendance in his/her office.

Monitoring of the implementation will be done by the Safety Department when conducting Weekly/Monthly inspections.

 

 

11.  Compliance with the COP

 

 

11.1.   COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE OF PRACTICE

  • On receival of the electronic copy of the new or revised Standard the HOD (Mine Overseers and Engineers, Finance and admin) will ensure that all Supervisors (Supervisors, Shift Supervisors, Foreman’s and Miners) sign the attached distribution list.
  • HOD Training or Talent Manager to:

‒Design support services to ensure clarity and understanding

‒Verify the effectiveness of the procedure as a communication tool

‒Provide refresher training especially if the procedure is used infrequently

‒Implement Standards where no training is required with immediate effect.

  • Safety department to audit and report during their scheduled visits the completeness of Standard books (files) kept at the working places.
  • Master copy of Standards to be kept on record with the Risk and Standard Compliance Coordinator.

 

 

3.  ACCESS TO THE CODE OF PRACTICE AND RELATED DOCUMENTS

 

3.1 Completed COP.

A. This code of practice is applicable to all affected person at the mine.

B. Once the code of practice has been completed it will be:

  • Published to PAR SHEQC Optimal Solve system
  • The original document will be kept by the Standards Coordinator

 

 

3.2 Trade Unions and Safety Representatives

  • Approved hard copies shall be issued to any affected person (e.g. A Union Member, Health & Safety Representative or Employee Representative), but only on written request to the relevant HOD.
  • The hard copies referred to in (a) above, shall be obtained from the Digital Database. This will ensure that only the most current version are being printed and issued.
  • It shall be the responsibility of each individual being issued with a hard copy, to immediately destroy all previous versions of this document, still in his/her possession.

 

3.3 All Employees

 

Electronic Copies

  • Risk and Standard Compliance Coordinator places the new revised Standard on PAR SHEQC Optimal-solve immediately after signing of approved standards.
  • Risk and Standard Compliance Coordinator distributes a copy via e-mail (pdf format) of the new or revised Standard to all Managers, Mine Overseers, Engineers, Training HOD, Stores and Relevant Stakeholders.
  • Risk and Standard Compliance Coordinator update the Document Control Register list.
  • Electronic copy of Standards can be found at PAR SHEQC Optimal-Solve.

 

 

Hard Copies

  • The HOD(s) will print out and communicate to his/her subordinates while documenting the attendance. Should any person be absent for whatever reason, the responsibility remains with the HOD to ensure that observers will be briefed at a later stage.
Skip to toolbar